Elaborate [Extra Biblical] Testimony: Part 3

Elaborate [Extra Biblical] Testimony: Part 3

Elaborate [Extra Biblical] Testimony: Part 3

1421 Posts

23 views

0



Our Last Interlocking Puzzle Piece comes from the Old Testament, you don´t want to miss this. Make sure to watch the entire video!

source

22 thoughts on “Elaborate [Extra Biblical] Testimony: Part 3

  1. Scott Wooley

    Love it and I downloaded the book

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  2. Elizabeth Shaw

    Nobody could make this up!

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  3. Peace O

    Wow! The antiBibles and atheists don't have a prayer!

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  4. Sosa's Steel Strings

    Yo why isnt this a novela? I would stay up on late firday night to watch this drama hahaha

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  5. Dustin Tower

    Thanks so much for sharing this book with us.

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  6. Samuel Ikechukwu

    this is amazing

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  7. Jack Jones

    This is fascinating! I've read the entire story of David many times but not done an in depth study of the complex dynamics behind the motives of each player. This displays how clearly God's guidelines for how we conduct ourselves are designed to protect us! The book to reference is "Undesigned Coincidences in the Writings Both of the Old and New Testament" by John James Blunt.

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  8. Zandi

    This is super cool

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  9. Doug Overhoff

    And some people think that the Bible's boring. Ha!

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  10. Hamlet Fortinbras

    Wow! Thank you— Truth is better than Agatha Christie!

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  11. Armand Esterhuizen

    Maaaaan The Bible is awesome

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  12. victor promiseviz

    sir again you a total time bomb in God's hand…may God bless you mightily

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  13. DarthMaulGamer2000

    So, an adversary of David was a family member of someone David killed. Therefore, the bible is true? What's the point of this video? What does this have to do with extra biblical testimony?

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  14. adrian maderal

    wow!! nice one…

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  15. RadNotion

    It looks like Frank does read the comments after he took down the video about Objective morality (4-5 videos ago) where every theistic argument about objective morality was destroyed and dismantled .

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  16. Ryan Peplinski

    That's amazing!!!

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  17. Cameron Monahan

    Such cool info! Keep it up Frank!!

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  18. PapalSoldier

    Also the case of King David proves the Catholic Dogma of Purgatory. King David was forgiven but hasn't made full satisfaction for it.

    [Purgatory is not for those who have died in the state of mortal sin. All such persons go to Hell, as is made clear in Galatians 5:19-21, 1 Corinthians. 6:9, and Ephesians 5:5-8. Purgatory is for those of the true faith who have been forgiven for their sins, but have yet to make full satisfaction for the sins they have committed.]

    In the case of King David. In 2 Kings 11 ( 2 Samuel 11 in the Protestant Bible), we read that King David committed adultery with Bathsheba. David also had her husband killed. These are mortal sins. If David would have died in that state, he would have gone to Hell. 1 Corinthians. 6:9 shows us that no adulterers or murderers will enter Heaven. But King David repented of his sin when convicted of it by Nathan in 2 Samuel 12.

    2 Kings 12:13 “And David said unto Nathan, I have sinned against the Lord. And Nathan said unto David, the Lord also hath put away thy sin; thou shalt not die.”

    The Lord took away David’s sin, and Nathan said that he would not die. This means that he would not eternally die. The guilt of the sin was forgiven because David truly repented and turned from it, but was that the end of it? No, full satisfaction for this mortal sin had not been made. We read in 2 Kings 12:14-15 that David had to suffer the loss of his child to make satisfaction for his sin – a sin which had already been forgiven.

    2 Kings 12:14-15 "… because by this deed thou hast given great occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme, the child also that is born unto thee shall surely die. And Nathan departed unto his house. And the Lord struck the child that Uriah’s wife bare unto David, and it was very sick."

    This provides undeniable proof that the guilt of a sin of a believer can be forgiven without the entire punishment being taken away. The Council of Trent put it this way:

    Pope Julius III, Council of Trent, on the Sacrament of Penance, Sess. 14, Chap. 8, Nov. 25, 1551 "… it is absolutely false and contrary to the word of God that the guilt [of a sin] is never forgiven by the Lord without the entire punishment also being remitted. For clear and illustrious examples are found in the Sacred Writings [cf. Gen. 3:16 f; Num. 12:14; Num 20:11; II Kings 12:13 f.; etc.]." (Denzinger 904)

    In this citation from the Council of Trent, we see references to numerous places in Scripture where a sin is forgiven without the entire punishment also being remitted. The example from Numbers 20 should be quoted.

    Numbers 20:11-12 "And Moses lifted up his hand, and with his rod he smote the rock twice: and the water came out abundantly, and the congregation drank, and their beasts also. And the Lord spoke unto Moses and Aaron, Because ye believed me not, to sanctify me in the eyes of the children of Israel, therefore ye shall not bring this congregation into the land which I have given them."

    When Moses, in obedience to God’s command, struck the rock in order to miraculously bring forth water, there was a certain level of hesitation in the act or in the manner in which he and Aaron presented it to the people. A Catholic commentary explains it: "The fault of Moses and Aaron, on this occasion, was a certain diffidence and weakness of faith; not doubting of God’s power or veracity; but apprehending the unworthiness of that rebellious and incredulous people, and therefore speaking with some ambiguity" (Douay-Rheims Commentary).

    As a result, God told Moses and Aaron that they would not be the ones to bring the people into the promised land. This was their punishment, even though they remained in God’s favor. This punishment was fulfilled. It was Joshua and Caleb who led the people into the promised land.

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  19. vermillion wraith

    this made my brain hurt :/

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  20. The Vince of Reason

    Amazing!

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  21. M-ZAP

    Awesome

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply
  22. Adamost

    Dang this is crazy

    May 24, 2021 at 8:56 pm Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *